WWRT Limited v Tyshchenko & Tyshchenko [2021] EWHC 939 (Ch)
Judgment date: 21 April 2021 (Bacon J)
Overview
(1) PST ENERGY 7 SHIPPING LLC; (2) PRODUCT SHIPPING & TRADING S.A. V. (1) O.W. BUNKER MALTA LTD; (2) ING BANK N.V. [2016] EWSC 23 (‘RES COGITANS’)
Judgment of the Supreme Court, 11 May 2016
Julian Kenny QC appeared for the Appellants in the Supreme Court who handed down judgment 11 May, a much anticipated ruling by shipowners and subsidiary companies affected by the OW Bunker collapse.
The judgment affirms the rulings of the Court of Appeal and of first instance Judge, Males J, that a contract for the supply of bunkers that a shipowner had entered into with a subsidiary of the now insolvent OW Bunker company was not one to which the Sale of Goods Act 1979 applies.
Guglielmo Verdirame of 20 Essex Street is advising on diplomatic immunity issues in the bankruptcy case of three-time Wimbledon champion Boris Becker. Together with Tony Beswetherick of 20 Essex Street, Guglielmo is instructed by Julian Cahn of Stephenson Harwood to act for the trustees: Mark Ford, Finbarr O'Connell and Gilbert Lemon. Mr Becker is claiming diplomatic immunity from bankruptcy proceedings on the basis that he is a diplomat for the Central African Republic.
The Court of Appeal has today handed down judgment in the case of Orexim Trading Limited v Mahavir Port and Terminal Private Limited [2018] EWCA Civ 1660, raising important issues as to the service of claims under s.423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 out of the jurisdiction.
Carlos Sevilleja Garcia v Marex Financial Limited [2018] EWCA Civ.1468
David Lewis QC and Richard Greenberg report on a significant judgment concerning the rule against reflective loss (the “RL Rule”).
In this case, the claimant brought proceedings against the first defendant claiming damages for breach of a settlement agreement, and an order under s.423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 for the setting aside of the sale of a vessel. It was alleged that the sale of the vessel was a sham designed to put the first defendant’s assets out of the reach of the claimant. The latter claim was also brought against two other defendants, being the purchaser and sub-purchaser of the vessel.
First published on LexisPSL Restructuring and Insolvency
Barristers Stephen Atherton QC and Charlotte Tan of 20 Essex Street review Ronelp Marine Ltd and other companies v STX Offshore & Shipbuilding Co Ltd—in which the High Court considers whether, and the circumstances where, it should lift a stay made under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations SI 2006/1030 to allow litigation proceedings to be continued in England by a creditor with an unsecured monetary claim.
HANJIN REHABILITATION STRATEGIC OPTIONS FOR OWNERS
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the of position of other members of 20 Essex Street Michael Collett QC 2016
Ports and retailers have been thrown into confusion with ships marooned and cargo trapped on board affected vessels as Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd ("Hanjin")'s creditors decided not to extend further financial support to the company.